home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac of the 20th Century
/
TIME, Almanac of the 20th Century.ISO
/
1990
/
93
/
jul_sep
/
09279915.000
< prev
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-02-27
|
5KB
|
123 lines
<text>
<title>
(Sep. 27, 1993) I Oppose...Palestinian State
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
Sep. 27, 1993 Attack Of The Video Games
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
MIDDLE EAST, Page 33
"I Oppose The Creation Of A Palestinian State"
</hdr><body>
<p>By LISA BEYER/TEL AVIV
</p>
<p> YITZHAK RABIN
</p>
<p> Q. Now that you've signed this agreement with the Palestinians,
what next?
</p>
<p> A. For me, the main test is the implementation, especially in
Gaza. Jericho is symbolic. In Gaza there are three-quarters
of a million Palestinians, poverty, economic and social problems.
The real problem is to what extent the P.L.O. will have the
means to take over. They have never been responsible for running
a large community -- to maintain law and order, to prevent terror,
to run an economy, to build houses, to run schools, to develop
industries. The whole future depends on how it works in Gaza-Jericho.
</p>
<p> Q. How do you think the Palestinians will manage self-rule?
</p>
<p> A. I believe there is a good chance they will succeed. But without
a tremendous amount of money from the outside, I don't see great
hope that they will manage even in Gaza.
</p>
<p> Q. How do you assess the security risks to Israel?
</p>
<p> A. The Palestinians don't present militarily a threat to the
existence of Israel. There are certain risks to the personal
security of a limited number of Israelis.
</p>
<p> Q. What if the personal-security risks to Israelis increase?
</p>
<p> A. If terror will continue, it means the Palestinians cannot
keep their commitments, so what is the meaning of the agreement?
</p>
<p> Q. In that case the accord would be rolled back?
</p>
<p> A. I didn't say so. You said it.
</p>
<p> Q. How will your government respond if the right wing in Israel
rebels against the accord?
</p>
<p> A. I don't believe that there will be rebellion. Israel is a
democracy. There might be expressions of opposition, but I believe
that whatever the government and Knesset approve will be carried
out.
</p>
<p> Q. What about rebellion against the Palestinian authorities?
</p>
<p> A. No doubt they'll have problems, mainly with Hamas. They will
focus on increased terror activities against Israelis. They
believe that the best way to foil the deal is to create antagonism
to the agreement among the Israelis. We had lately suicide terror
acts. It creates problems.
</p>
<p> Q. The Labor Party seems to be softening its opposition to a
Palestinian state.
</p>
<p> A. No. I am against this. I oppose the creation of an independent
Palestinian state between Israel and Jordan, and I don't believe
that at this stage it would be a good idea if I brought out
the options.
</p>
<p> Q. How will the accord affect your negotiations with Syria,
Lebanon and Jordan?
</p>
<p> A. We expect the other partners in the peace negotiations to
assist in the implementation of what has been agreed upon with
the Palestinians. I don't see a problem signing a peace treaty
with Jordan tomorrow if they limit the issues to Jordanian-Israeli
problems. It will facilitate negotiations with Syria, but maybe
on a longer timetable.
</p>
<p> Q. When you shook Arafat's hand in Washington, you managed a
smile. Or was it a grimace?
</p>
<p> A. I can't remember. I stood there for about one hour. Do you
expect me to remember every expression that I had?
</p>
<p> Q. It must have been a memorable moment. How did you feel?
</p>
<p> A. It was not easy.
</p>
<p> Q. What made you decide finally to deal directly with the P.L.O.?
</p>
<p> A. It took me and others a long time to overcome the mental
and practical block to this. For 30 years the P.L.O. carried
out terror activities, among them many cases I can call atrocities.
But mutual recognition, in my humble opinion -- to the extent
that they will keep their commitment, and I assume they will
-- made the P.L.O. entirely different from what it was before.
</p>
<p> Q. You are 71 years old, late in your political career. Did
this motivate you to reach a solution now?
</p>
<p> A. It is not a question of my age but a question of my purpose
in being in politics. When I decided to run for Prime Minister,
I believed that the coincidence of events on the international
scene, in the Middle East, in Israel were ripe to achieve two
goals: peace and security, and changing the order of national
priorities for the people of Israel -- not to look at the territories
as the main issue. At least 96% of Israeli Jews live on sovereign
Israeli soil, within the green lines, including united Jerusalem.
The future of Israel depends much more on what that 96% of Jews
and about 1 million non-Jewish Israeli citizens will achieve
in their economy, social progress, cultural and scientific achievements.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>